From 45c31be7dbf81517e854304237bb95d53657b27d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:37:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] insist on the KML optimisation, agreed to ditch the folders support and editor-specific stuff --- doc/todo/osm__95__optimisations__95__and__95__fixes.mdwn | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/osm__95__optimisations__95__and__95__fixes.mdwn b/doc/todo/osm__95__optimisations__95__and__95__fixes.mdwn index 008a1119b..002b2a22c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/osm__95__optimisations__95__and__95__fixes.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/osm__95__optimisations__95__and__95__fixes.mdwn @@ -10,12 +10,16 @@ I have two main branches that need merging (on top of [[todo/osm_arbitrary_layer > If it's not supported yet, does it break something? Seems it must be hard > to test the change at least if it's not supported. --[[Joey]] +> > Good point. Maybe that can be skipped for now, it sure doesn't look like it will be merged any time soon anyways. I do think that the optimisation needs to be merged, it's quite important because if halves the size of the resulting KML file. --[[anarcat]] + * `osm_openlayers_misc` - do not override the sorting of layers (so that the order defined in [[todo/osm_arbitrary_layers]] takes effect) and tell Emacs about the non-default indentation policies of the file. > I prefer not to pollute files with editor-specific garbage, and that goes > doubly for files served over the network. Cherry-picked the layer sorting > change. --[[Joey]] +> > Alright, I am fine with that, thanks. -- [[anarcat]] + Those two branches are also merged directly on my master branch... along with [[todo/osm_arbitrary_layers]]. I am filing this as one todo to simplify matter, but I can also split it further if needs be. --[[anarcat]] -- 2.44.0