X-Git-Url: https://scripts.mit.edu/gitweb/www/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/6caed59b9c852836371f9542636da290350c0e8b..c0324124f764f433ac5672ee7e498f074c28322f:/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn b/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn index 373f89364..dd9793233 100644 --- a/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ something, that I think is very valuable. >>>> Which would rule out openid, or other fun forms of auth. And routing all access >>>> through the CGI sort of defeats the purpose of ikiwiki. --[[Ethan]] +>>>>> I think what Joey is suggesting is to use apache ACLs in conjunction +>>>>> with basic HTTP auth to control read access, and ikiwiki can use the +>>>>> information via the httpauth plugin for other ACLs (write, admin). But +>>>>> yes, that would rule out non-httpauth mechanisms. -- [[Jon]] + Also see [[!debbug 443346]]. > Just a few quick thoughts about this: @@ -44,7 +49,8 @@ Also see [[!debbug 443346]]. >> Yes, writing per-user commit ACLs has become somewhat easier with recent >> features. Breaking `match_user` out of attachment, and making the >> lockedit plugin pass`user` and `ip` params when it calls `pagespec_match` ->> would be sufficient. --[[Joey]] +>> would be sufficient. And [[done]], configurable via +>> [[plugin/lockedit]]'s `locked_pages`. --[[Joey]] I am considering giving this a try, implementing it as a module. Here is how I see it: @@ -68,3 +74,25 @@ Here is how I see it:
\[[!acl user=* page=/subsite/* acl=/subsite/acl.mdwn]]+ +Any idea when this is going to be finished? If you want, I am happy to beta test. + +> It's already done, though that is sorta hidden in the above. :-) +> Example of use to only allow two users to edit the tipjar page: +> locked_pages => 'tipjar and !(user(joey) or user(bob))', +> --[[Joey]] + +> > Thank you for the hint but I am being still confused (read: dense)... What I am trying to do is this: + +> > * No anonymous access. +> > * Logged in users can edit and create pages. +> > * Users can set who can edit their pages. +> > * Some pages are only viewable by admins. + +> > Is it possible? If so how?... + +>>> I don't believe this is currently possible. What is missing is the concept +>>> of page 'ownership'. -- [[Jon]] + +>>>> GAH! That is really a shame... Any chance of adding that? No, I do not really expect it to be added, after all my requirements are pushing the boundary of what a wikiwiki + should be. Nonetheless, thanks for your help!