+- Make scripts AFS patch advertise its existence so we can check for it.
+ (This might be otherwise possible using `fs sysname`)
+- Make 'wizard summary' generate nice pretty graphs of installs by date
+ (more histograms, will need to check actual .scripts-version files.)
+- It should be able to handle installs like Django where there's a component
+ that gets installed in web_scripts and another directory that gets installed
+ in Scripts.
+
+PULLING OUT CONFIGURATION FILES IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER
+
+advancedpoll: Template file to fill out
+django: Noodles of template files
+gallery2: Multistage install process
+joomla: Template file
+mediawiki: One-step install process
+phpbb: Multistage install process
+phpical: Template file
+trac: NFC
+turbogears: NFC
+wordpress: Multistage install process
+
+PHILOSOPHY ABOUT LOGGING
+
+Logging is most useful when performing a mass run. This
+includes things such as mass-migration as well as when running
+summary reports. An interesting property about mass-migration
+or mass-upgrade, however, is that if they fail, they are
+idempotent, so an individual case can be debugged simply running
+the single-install equivalent with --debug on. (This, indeed,
+may be easier to do than sifting through a logfile).
+
+It is a different story when you are running a summary report:
+you are primarily bound by your AFS cache and how quickly you can
+iterate through all of the autoinstalls. Checking if a file
+exists on a cold AFS cache may
+take several minutes to perform; on a hot cache the same report
+may take a mere 3 seconds. When you get to more computationally
+expensive calculations, however, even having a hot AFS cache
+is not enough to cut down your runtime.
+
+There are certain calculations that someone may want to be
+able to perform on manipulated data. As such, this data should
+be cached on disk, if the process for extracting this data takes
+a long time. Also, for usability sake, Wizard should generate
+the common case reports.
+
+Ensuring that machine parseable reports are made, and then making
+the machinery to reframe this data, increases complexity. Therefore,
+the recommendation is to assume that if you need to run iteratively,
+you'll have a hot AFS cache at your fingerprints, and if that's not
+fast enough, then cache the data.