- Also, for each distributor's protection, we want to make certain\r
-that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free\r
-library. If the library is modified by someone else and passed on, we\r
-want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original\r
-version, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on\r
-the original authors' reputations.\r
-.\r
- Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software\r
-patents. We wish to avoid the danger that companies distributing free\r
-software will individually obtain patent licenses, thus in effect\r
-transforming the program into proprietary software. To prevent this,\r
-we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's\r
-free use or not licensed at all.\r
-\r
- Most GNU software, including some libraries, is covered by the ordinary\r
-GNU General Public License, which was designed for utility programs. This\r
-license, the GNU Library General Public License, applies to certain\r
-designated libraries. This license is quite different from the ordinary\r
-one; be sure to read it in full, and don't assume that anything in it is\r
-the same as in the ordinary license.\r
-\r
- The reason we have a separate public license for some libraries is that\r
-they blur the distinction we usually make between modifying or adding to a\r
-program and simply using it. Linking a program with a library, without\r
-changing the library, is in some sense simply using the library, and is\r
-analogous to running a utility program or application program. However, in\r
-a textual and legal sense, the linked executable is a combined work, a\r
-derivative of the original library, and the ordinary General Public License\r
-treats it as such.\r
-\r
- Because of this blurred distinction, using the ordinary General\r
-Public License for libraries did not effectively promote software\r
-sharing, because most developers did not use the libraries. We\r
-concluded that weaker conditions might promote sharing better.\r
-\r
- However, unrestricted linking of non-free programs would deprive the\r
-users of those programs of all benefit from the free status of the\r
-libraries themselves. This Library General Public License is intended to\r
-permit developers of non-free programs to use free libraries, while\r
-preserving your freedom as a user of such programs to change the free\r
-libraries that are incorporated in them. (We have not seen how to achieve\r
-this as regards changes in header files, but we have achieved it as regards\r
-changes in the actual functions of the Library.) The hope is that this\r
-will lead to faster development of free libraries.\r
+ To protect each distributor, we want to make it very clear that\r
+there is no warranty for the free library. Also, if the library is\r
+modified by someone else and passed on, the recipients should know\r
+that what they have is not the original version, so that the original\r
+author's reputation will not be affected by problems that might be\r
+introduced by others.\r
+\r
+ Finally, software patents pose a constant threat to the existence of\r
+any free program. We wish to make sure that a company cannot\r
+effectively restrict the users of a free program by obtaining a\r
+restrictive license from a patent holder. Therefore, we insist that\r
+any patent license obtained for a version of the library must be\r
+consistent with the full freedom of use specified in this license.\r
+\r
+ Most GNU software, including some libraries, is covered by the\r
+ordinary GNU General Public License. This license, the GNU Lesser\r
+General Public License, applies to certain designated libraries, and\r
+is quite different from the ordinary General Public License. We use\r
+this license for certain libraries in order to permit linking those\r
+libraries into non-free programs.\r
+\r
+ When a program is linked with a library, whether statically or using\r
+a shared library, the combination of the two is legally speaking a\r
+combined work, a derivative of the original library. The ordinary\r
+General Public License therefore permits such linking only if the\r
+entire combination fits its criteria of freedom. The Lesser General\r
+Public License permits more lax criteria for linking other code with\r
+the library.\r
+\r
+ We call this license the "Lesser" General Public License because it\r
+does Less to protect the user's freedom than the ordinary General\r
+Public License. It also provides other free software developers Less\r
+of an advantage over competing non-free programs. These disadvantages\r
+are the reason we use the ordinary General Public License for many\r
+libraries. However, the Lesser license provides advantages in certain\r
+special circumstances.\r
+\r
+ For example, on rare occasions, there may be a special need to\r
+encourage the widest possible use of a certain library, so that it becomes\r
+a de-facto standard. To achieve this, non-free programs must be\r
+allowed to use the library. A more frequent case is that a free\r
+library does the same job as widely used non-free libraries. In this\r
+case, there is little to gain by limiting the free library to free\r
+software only, so we use the Lesser General Public License.\r
+\r
+ In other cases, permission to use a particular library in non-free\r
+programs enables a greater number of people to use a large body of\r
+free software. For example, permission to use the GNU C Library in\r
+non-free programs enables many more people to use the whole GNU\r
+operating system, as well as its variant, the GNU/Linux operating\r
+system.\r
+\r
+ Although the Lesser General Public License is Less protective of the\r
+users' freedom, it does ensure that the user of a program that is\r
+linked with the Library has the freedom and the wherewithal to run\r
+that program using a modified version of the Library.\r