Adderall for all?
Posted in Uncategorized on December 9th, 2008 by bpope – Be the first to commentI read two very interesting articles in the past couple days. The first an interview in Technology Review, and the second the Science article (an editorial) written by the interviewee. The subject of both pieces are the moral and social consequences or cognitive enhancing drugs. The conclusion of the Science authors is that:
According to the piece, written by a group of ethicists, psychologists, and cognitive neuroscientists, “cognitive enhancement, unlike enhancement for sports competitions, could lead to substantive improvements in the world.” While opponents have argued that the use of performance-enhancing drugs is unfair and could undermine the value of hard work, the authors say that these drugs fall into the same category as more common efforts to increase brain function, such as drinking a cup of coffee, or getting a good night’s sleep, and thus should be regulated accordingly.
My knee jerk reaction was WAIT, wouldn’t that just coerce everyone who hopes to be competitive in academia or the workplace to take the cognitive enhancing drugs? Then I thought about it some more…is that so much of a bad thing? Many military personal are required to take certain drugs to improve their performance and concentration levels. As the authors argue, would it be so different to ask surgeons to do the same?
Of course, this is a tremendously complex subject, but I think it depends heavily on the effects of these medications: will it harm the user in either the short term or the long term? If not, then maybe it makes sense to de-regulate these mental performance enhancing drugs. I think the authors of the commentary in Science put together a very well written piece, well worth reading (at least the bits in bold).
After all, what’s the point of having a technology if you can’t use it for good?