Sorry for the late reply. I have to agree with your skepticism of the Democrats. However, the Republicans have presided over the largest increase in the federal budget that I’ve ever been alive for. Why do we always give the Republicans carte blanche to use the federal government when it’s for homeland security, but we don’t give the Democrats the same leeway with their utopian social security? Aren’t both just types of security fantasy? I’m seriously asking. I tend to think physical security is at least somewhat in keeping with the fundamental nature of a central government, but both will bankrupt us at the rate the feds are going, and both appear to be handled just as incompetently.

And, as if more proof were needed that there is a liberal media bias, where is hue and cry about Hillary thwarting the will of the people? I can think of few things less democratic than the concept of the “superdelegate”.

Great post!